Skip to content
  • About us
    • Mission
    • Function
    • Director and project officer
    • Newsletter
    • current political and legal issues
  • Research
    • Research Network
    • Interactive Bibliography
    • Legislations
    • Upcoming Publications
    • Conferences
  • Law Review
    • The Law Review
    • Submit an article
    • Board of Editors
  • Blog
  • Recent developments
  • Contact
  • About us
    • Mission
    • Function
    • Director and project officer
    • Newsletter
    • current political and legal issues
  • Research
    • Research Network
    • Interactive Bibliography
    • Legislations
    • Upcoming Publications
    • Conferences
  • Law Review
    • The Law Review
    • Submit an article
    • Board of Editors
  • Blog
  • Recent developments
  • Contact
  • Français
  • Home
  • Recent developments
  • Articles
  • Applicant v. College of Health and Care Professionals of British Columbia (No. 1), 2025 BCHPRB 19

Applicant v. College of Health and Care Professionals of British Columbia (No. 1), 2025 BCHPRB 19

Visit the website
www.canlii.org/en/bc/bchprb/doc/2025/2025bchprb19/2025bchprb19.html?resultId=8b7fdd9a19e041faa15008cd9ac82957&searchId=2026-02-02T11:46:11:261/cb37c78444b14a1694d306aab8314b92
British Columbia

This decision concerns the refusal by a professional regulatory body to register a French-speaking speech-language pathologist trained abroad on the basis that she did not meet the English language proficiency requirement. The applicant argued that her registration should have been granted on a conditional basis, as she undertook to practise exclusively in French within a francophone school board.

The applicant relied, in particular, on the underlying values of section 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and on the importance of access to professional services in French for the francophone minority. The regulatory body concluded that the English language proficiency requirement served the objective of public protection and that it lacked the authority to grant registration limited to practice in French.

On review, the decision-maker concluded that language rights protected by the Charter do not confer a right to professional registration and that the values underlying section 23 do not extend to the regulation of access to health professions. The English language proficiency requirement was found to be reasonable and consistent with the objective of public protection.

The application for review was dismissed.

© All rights reserved. International Observatory on Language Rights. A creative website by VOX Interactif.
Site map
Contact Us
Pavillon Adrien-J.-Cormier
18, avenue Antonine-Maillet
Moncton New Brunswick  E1A 3E9
Téléphone : 506-858-4491
Logo Université de Moncton - Campus de Moncton - Faculté de droit
Subscribe to the Newsletter
Stay up to date on the Observatory's activities by subscribing to the newsletter.
subscribe