Interactive Bibliography
We hereby wish to thank the Supreme Court Law Review (LexisNexis Canada), Revue générale de droit, the Revue juridique Thémis, and the Revue de la common law en français for granting us permission to reproduce the language rights related articles that were published in their review. Their collaboration played a key role in the success of the interactive bibliography.
-
Who should have official language rights?
CanadaPeriodical and collective articles—Alan Patten
(2006) 31 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2d) 235-248Download the file -
Why the FCA Decision in Schmidt v Canada (Attorney General) is Clearly Erroneous
CanadaPeriodical and collective articles—Edgar Schmidt
(2020) 43:2 Man LJ 149 -
Why Write Statutes Which Some People Cannot Read?
CanadaStudies—Paul Daly
2020 CanLIIDocs 3617